The masters

The writers I owe most to, and the works of theirs that shaped my thinking. An incomplete list, in no particular order.

Stanisław Lem

Solaris, His Master's Voice, Fiasco, The Cyberiad. The patron saint of taking communication seriously enough to ask whether it is actually possible. Where most science fiction borrows the language of contact — codecs, translation, eventual mutual understanding — Lem starts from the opposite end: that meaningful communication across cognitive architectures may be structurally impossible, and that the interesting territory is what we do anyway. The framework on the What drives my stories page is his.

Arthur C. Clarke

Rendezvous with Rama, Childhood's End, 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Fountains of Paradise, The Songs of Distant Earth, The City and the Stars. For showing that the strange can be approached with patience and instruments — and that the most powerful encounters need not resolve into explanation. Few writers have made the universe feel quite as vast, or as patient.

Robert L. Forward

Dragon's Egg, Starquake, Rocheworld, Camelot 30K. A physicist before he was a novelist — and a novelist precisely because the physics already implied the story. His aliens emerge from genuinely exotic conditions: life on the surface of a neutron star, civilisations whose entire history fits inside a human afternoon. Few writers have demonstrated so clearly that strangeness need not be invented — it can be discovered by taking the actual universe seriously.

Larry Niven

Ringworld, The Ringworld Engineers, A Mote in God's Eye and Footfall (both with Jerry Pournelle), and the Known Space stories. For scale, and for aliens whose strangeness is structural rather than cosmetic. The Moties of A Mote in God's Eye are not humans with extra limbs — their biology, their reproductive cycle, and their entire civilisation are tangled together in ways that humans recognise only too late. Niven taught a generation of writers that the alien is not a costume but a system, and that the megastructure (the Ringworld itself) is no substitute for asking who built it and why they stopped.

E. E. "Doc" Smith

The Lensman series — Triplanetary through Children of the Lens — and the Skylark sequence. The author who effectively invented space opera in the 1930s and 1940s, and the one who showed that science fiction could play at galactic scale without losing its nerve. The Lensman books are not subtle, but they are big in a way nothing else of their era was — civilisations clashing across millions of years, mind-against-mind battles, the slow elevation of intelligence toward something genuinely transhuman. The first SF I loved, and the reason the genre still feels like home.

Eric Frank Russell

Wasp, Sinister Barrier, Men, Martians and Machines, And Then There Were None. For showing that humour and absurdity can carry a contact story as well as gravitas can. Russell's aliens are often funny — not in spite of being threatening but as part of why they're threatening — and his humans are often anarchically clever in ways more solemn SF would never permit. Wasp showed that a single saboteur with the right insights could break an empire; And Then There Were None made a comedy out of resisting interstellar bureaucracy. He proved the genre had room for wit.

Piers Anthony

Macroscope. A first-contact novel built around an instrument that lets the strangeness arrive on its own terms. The macroscope itself is the great invention: a way of looking at the universe that exceeds light-speed limits and brings back not images but something closer to direct observation of consciousness. Anthony pairs that cosmology with characters whose interior lives are as ambitious as the scale, which most SF of its era did not bother to do. Macroscope is one of those novels that reminds you the genre's reach is wider than its reputation.

Raymond E. Feist

The Riftwar Saga, beginning with Magician, and the Empire trilogy — Daughter of the Empire, Servant of the Empire, and Mistress of the Empire (with Janny Wurts). For worlds dense enough to live in, and for politics that takes the long view. Magician is a first-contact story in disguise — two worlds bridged by a rift, two civilisations slowly learning each other through misunderstanding and consequence. The Empire trilogy is among the finest sustained explorations in fantasy of how a culture changes when forced to look at itself from outside. Feist proved that genre lines are arbitrary; the questions are the same.

And not forgetting great masters like Isaac Asimov, Frank Herbert, Stephen Coonts, David Gibbins, and the many others who have created such amazing stories.

Who would you add? Who would you push back on? Send me feedback →

← All novels